Category Archives: Political Rants

Finding enemies.

All right – I was listening to journalist James Bamford on Democracy Now! talk about his new book on the NSA, The Shadow Factory, and it has really made me angry. Part of what is so irritating about this is that it isn’t even considered significant news – that people have become so inured to the notion of a government tapping their phones, reading their email, transcribing their private conversations, and archiving them for whatever future use they may want to put them to. For chrissake, these fuckers in the Bush White House directed the NSA to work with companies like AT&T and Verizon – companies that profit from our business – to sift through our correspondence without any limits, to the point where staffers at the NSA were actually passing around recordings of intimate phone calls between members of our military deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan and their spouses and partners back home. Hey, Charlie – get a load of this one! What the fuck.

But it’s far worse than just an invasion of privacy. In accord with typical Fortune 500 practice, the telecom “giants” outsourced the actual data collection and analysis to foreign-connected firms, including two companies named Narus and Verint, both founded in Israel. Verint can boast of a founder and former CEO who is currently on the lamb in Namibia to avoid prosecution for felony charges of fraud and other violations. Both companies have extensive relationships with intelligence services in anti-democratic and repressive regimes the world over. Bamford also tells of the NSA’s pre-9/11 fuck-ups, including not informing the FBI that two Al Qaeda 9/11 hijackers under surveillance by the NSA were living in Los Angeles and, later, within spitting distance of the NSA headquarters in Laurel, Maryland. (The hijackers even frequented the same restaurants and Gold’s Gym as NSA staffers.) Even more bone-chilling for me was his description of how NSA analysts in Georgia determine targets in Iraq and Afghanistan – i.e. houses to bomb or invade – based on sloppy translations of communications intercepts and often reckless assumptions about what is being said. So people are killed, wounded, and incarcerated on the basis of snap decisions made in a building thousands of miles away.

This obsession with all-encompassing surveillance and an expansion of our ability to project deadly force anywhere on the globe with the casual push of a button – it is all intimately intertwined. This has been the project of the U.S. government for at least the last decade, probably longer. It involves a massive investment in the technology of death – sophisticated unmanned drones, orbital launch platforms, etc., all capable of reaching any point on the planet nearly instantaneously whenever our interests are threatened, in a manner so easy and safe that even Cheney could do it. Those “interests,” by the way, include economic considerations, obstruction of trade, disruption of shipping or energy supplies, and so on. So this is the 21st Century equivalent of gunboat diplomacy, executed with a simplicity once seen only in television dramas. “Find the enemy. Kill the enemy.” In what is often called the most important election of our lifetimes, I have yet to hear this issue addressed by the major party candidates. What will either of them do about this steady movement toward the establishment of a global police state for that less-fortunate 70% of humanity?

Kind of seems like the answer is “nothing”. That’s why we need to push a little harder on this.

luv you,

jp

Not said.

Last debate of the presidential season this past week – #49, I believe – and it was kind of hideous, in my view. Someone in the McCain campaign must have given their man the word to look at Obama, not just once, but frequently. And for god’s sake, don’t look too angry… try to smile from time to time, even when you’re looking at the Muslimy Kenyan guy who hangs with terrorists. Well, McCain appeared to have taken all this advice a bit too literally. For long periods while Obama was speaking, the Republican nominee leered at his opponent with a strange, pasted-on smile, leaning back stiffly in his chair, his eyes glassy, almost zombie-like at times. I know I’ve commented on this before, but McCain looks for all the world like someone applying anger management techniques in the most exhausting way. He has that tendency to deliver a speech in that slow, sing-song fashion, like he’s talking to preschoolers just before nap time. It’s like somebody squeezed a wolverine into a rabbit suit – that’s the John McCain I saw Wednesday night.

Of course, a lot went unsaid and I don’t know why, except that maybe neither candidate feels all that strongly about any of it. Stuff like, well… Iraq, a war that’s still killing and maiming way too many people. (Don’t think so? Look at Juan Cole’s regular synopsis of news from the region.) I know this was a “domestic issues” debate, but really… it can go pretty much anywhere the candidates want it to go. Why didn’t Obama ask McCain if he opposes the draft “security pact” that calls for total withdrawal of U.S. forces by the end of 2011? (Can you say “timetable”?) Presumably McCain opposes that – let’s get him on the record, eh?

How about Social Security? Not much, if anything, said in these last three debates, though I’ve learned that “Joe the plant”… I mean, “Joe the (right-wing talk show regular) plumber” thinks it was a bad idea. This very useful information aside, voters have been provided with virtually no information about either candidates intentions regarding S.S., particularly McCain’s rehash of the perennial G.O.P. plan to save the program by bleeding it to death. McCain doesn’t believe current workers should pay into a fund that supports current retirees…. but that’s precisely how S.S. works. It isn’t designed to individual retirement accounts – it’s designed to be a guaranteed minimum supplementary pension for any worker and/or spouse who reaches retirement age, regardless of whether they’ve been lucky investors or not. (And, as such, it’s been an immensely successful program, keeping old folks out of abject poverty for more than sixty years.) Like all Republicans and many blue-dog Democrats, McCain hates the idea and would rather hand the trust fund money over to the Wall Street pirates he now excoriates on the campaign trail, so that if a worker nearing retirement encounters a downturn (like right now) or is just unlucky in health or fortune, s/he can go to the soup kitchen for his/her pension.

There’s a lot else that wasn’t discussed – missile defense, private military contractors, politicization of the Justice Department, domestic spying, arbitrary detention, pre-emptive war, etc. What did get discussed, aside from the opinions of “Joe the plant”, was McCain’s idea of what constitutes a threat to the very “fabric of our democracy” – i.e. a volunteer organization like ACORN – and the fact that the “woman’s health” exception in anti-abortion legislation is some kind of extremist pro-abortion dodge. Sweet guy.

Oh yes… and Bill Ayres is a “terrorist”. Like McCain friend G. Gordon Liddy. Like every Republican’s friend Luis Posada Carriles. Like McCain booster Oliver North. Like still-president George W. Bush.

luv u,

jp

Out now.

Skipped a week on you. Well, no sweat, friends, because today I’m loaded for bear. And no, it’s not just because the Republican party is playing their usual race-baiting, terror-scare election game (no surprise). It’s also because our two running wars are politically off the table, or – worse yet – are seen somehow as a stronger issue for that septuagenarian crank McCain, who was dead wrong on Iraq from the beginning and shows every indication of making the same type of error again and again.

I read an Associated Press article the other day that nearly blew the top of my head off. The Bush administration is still negotiating its “security pact” or status of forces agreement with the government of Iraq, of course, and the Iraqi position is that they want the last U.S. troops to leave their country by the end of 2011, unless they request us to stay (and we, of course, agree). Our negotiators are trying to talk them out of it. Why the fuck are they doing that? And why the fuck won’t the press and the politicians bring that point up a bit more often? If Iraq wants us out, why disabuse them of that notion?

This should be a problem for McCain. If it hadn’t been for him and the administration, our military people (including our National Guard, which never should have been sent there) might have been out of Iraq by now, or at least well on their way. The “surge” is just a stage prop for McCain – it has had little to do with the marginal reduction of violence in Iraq, and a whole lot to do with the scores of Americans and god-knows-how many Iraqis killed since its implementation more than a year ago. Violence is down (not gone) because a) the Mehdi Army is observing a cease fire, b) many Sunni insurgents chose to join the “Awakening Councils” and take the Americans’ money rather than continue fighting a civil conflict they were destined to lose, and c) ethnic cleansing in Iraq is substantially complete, with the country (and particularly Baghdad) divided into sectarian enclaves, some walled off from one another. The place is still a tinder box where people fear to wander out of their own neighborhoods and killings occurring at what would be considered a sickening pace anywhere else. (See Juan Cole’s blog for daily news out of that sorry country.)

Then there are the refugees – millions of them in Syria and Jordan. Most will likely never return home again. Their neighborhoods have been overrun by partisans of another sectarian group, their homes taken over, their lives threatened. The A.P. ran a story the other day about an Iraqi embassy program in Syria offering a free trip home for refugee families, plus incentives totaling about $1,800 U.S. This past Tuesday they opened a registration center in Damascus – no one showed up. Bupkis. This will be a problem for some time to come, and I suspect these refugee populations will not only strain the resources of the host countries (one of which – Syria – is being scapegoated and strangled by us) but provide a rich breeding ground for future extremists. Perhaps some of Hosni Mubarak’s “1000 Bin Ladens” resulting from the Iraq war will be raised in these camps.

Still, McCain assures us that the surge is “working”, that victory is at hand, and that a democratic Iraq will reduce Iranian influence. Is he lying or just stupid? Iraq is a majority Shiite country (like Iran) ruled by political parties once exiled in Iran (one of the main coalition parties – the former SCIRI – was formed in Iran). Democracy can only mean closer relations between the two former belligerents. (McCain – if you’re confused, ask Lieberman.)

Bottom line, to quote the late great Molly Ivins: Get. Out. Now. Why the hell isn’t Obama saying this?

luv u,

jp