Is this the spring of 2002, summer of 2006, or winter of 2009? I’ve lost track. The Israelis are again engaged in using their enormous (largely U.S. supplied) military might to crush a virtually defenseless people they are compelled by international statute to protect, dropping so-called precision weapons on one of the most densely populated parcels of land on earth and blaming the predictable resulting civilian deaths on those they target. Soon their tanks will roll into the open air prison that is Gaza on yet another mad, premeditated mission of murder and rampage, punishing 1.5 million Palestinians for voting the wrong way two years ago and, more fundamentally, for refusing to disappear as a people. Israel’s leaders, once more bloodying the ground for the next election, are intoning the rhetoric of the injured party, the enlightened state that has already endured too much, been too lenient, too forgiving, etc., as they pursue a strategy long in the making to decapitate Hamas while scoring substantial injury on all Palestinians. Their government officials and spokespersons, their surrogates in the American press, and their apologists in our own government repeat the mantra of self defense, likening lowly Hamas to the legions of Hitler (per Netanyahu) when comparisons even to Hizbullah are ludicrously overblown.

Like their depraved campaign in the West Bank in 2002 and the murderous war on Lebanon in 2006, this is the kind of assault that should be taken up by the U.N. Security Council and, ultimately, the Hague. I’m not holding my breath. From around the world, the response has ranged from equivocation to full-throated support for Olmert and Barak’s war. As Ali Abunimah said recently on Democracy Now!, Israel is waging war against a captive population, bombing mosques, hospitals, universities, and refugee camps. It is the most wanton attack against Palestinians in decades, and they are following through on it behind a protective shroud of silence. Israeli policymakers are confident that the United States government will be behind them no matter what they do, and that spineless leaders from Britain to Bahrain will refrain from raising their voices, or merely imply some kind of moral equivalency between the attackers and the victims. When Russia took action against Georgia, the outrage was deafening. Yet Israel bombs the most miserable place on earth, and you can hear crickets.

Let us not forget the genesis of this particular outrage. Hamas won the parliamentary elections in the Palestinian territories in 2006. Israel and the U.S. found this unacceptable and immediately began undermining the results of that election, applying pressure on Abu Mazen, their hand-picked Palestinian representative, to move against Hamas. They supplied Fatah with arms and were in the process of stoking a coup in Gaza when Hamas anticipated their move and drove Fatah from the strip in 2007. Since then, the Israelis and the United States have held the Gaza strip under siege, starving its populace, denying basic medical supplies, and generally engaging in collective punishment against the population in hopes that they would turn against Hamas. The vaunted cease-fire has never been observed by Israel, which has run bombing raids on Gaza through the duration. They picked this opportune moment to complete the job Abu Mazen was unable to finish for them more than a year ago.

In 2002, Arafat was the “terrorist” and the obstruction to peace. Now it’s Hamas, precisely because they earned the support of a majority of Palestinians. Hamas is willing to negotiate on equal terms with Israel – that makes them unacceptable. Israel wants a negotiating partner they can roll over and dictate terms to. What we’re seeing is their attempt to ensure that advantage will continue, through air raids that recall Guernica and god knows what else.

Make your voice heard. This killing will stop only if we abandon our silence.

luv u,

jp

Hi again, campers. Back to the Obama to-do list. Since the guy’s on vacation, I imagine he might even be able to find the time to read this one. Pull it up on your blackberry while you’re sitting on the beach. That’s http://www.hammermilldays.com/, Mr. President-Elect. There’s a good chap. This week, domestic policy.

Auto bailout. This is indeed a miserable business. The Bush administration has made such a muddle of the economy that it actually makes some of his other monumental failures pale in comparison. And yet when he came forward with the terms of his proposal, he did so in a somewhat self-righteous way, as if to lecture the industry on its failings. There are plenty of failures to take note of, that’s for sure… but Bush is in no position to criticize, quite frankly. (It’s a bit like Bernie Madoff giving advice on prudent investing.) What is particularly maddening is his focus on the auto workers. In what appears an attempt to throw his fellow Herbert Hoover republicans a bone, he has made the loan offer contingent on substantial labor concessions to bring their wages in line, as he sees it, with those of foreign manufacturers.

Here’s the real joke – UAW workers are making about the same as their non-union counterparts right now. Conservatives like to throw around wild numbers like $73 an hour as somehow representative of UAW scale. That’s what Bush used to call “fuzzy math.” They’re lumping wages together with retiree pensions and benefits and dividing that across the current active workforce. (Labor activist Gregg Shotwell gave a pretty good overview on Democracy Now! last week.) He and the G.O.P. leadership are keen to force some sacrifice on workers, even as corporate executives in the financial industry are still pocketing millions of dollars, including many of those at A.I.G., recipient of more than $150 billion in TARP funds.

This is consistent with the prevailing economic philosophy that favors maximizing corporate profits through outsourcing. As Shotwell explains, the auto companies have been investing overseas for years, so if their U.S. operations fail, they will still have enough assets in other countries to actually start “exporting” cars to the U.S. This would be a much more profitable model for them. Meanwhile, GM’s financial arm, GMAC, has managed to get itself classified as a bank holding company so that it can get a piece of the financial bailout cash. So the car companies can survive even if they employ next to no one in the United States.

Mr. President-Elect – take the workers’ side, for chrissake. If we’re going to try to make the domestic auto industry competitive with foreign auto makers, we’re going to need to move to a single-payer national health plan that provides universal coverage (not some kind of frankenstinian public-private hybrid). That’s what our main competitors have, along with more robust government sponsored pension systems. And if we’re going to bail out the automakers, let’s take an ownership stake in those companies and use that influence to steer them in a better, more sustainable direction that encourages domestic production of more fuel-efficient vehicles, as well as the development of greener mass transit.

Oh… and get a handle on this TARP bailout. These fuckers are walking off with boatloads of cash, and Congress seems unable to do anything about it. Enjoy your vacation.

luv u,

jp